Home > Physics > Detail

When is a secondary source more helpful than a primary source? A. When you want to confirm the conclusion with your own experiment B. When you are not an expert in the field being studied in the experiment C. When you do not need to know the conclusion of the experiment D. When you want to know the exact data values


The correct answer is option A. A secondary source is advantageous over a primary one if you desire to verify your experiment's conclusion. Utilizing both primary and secondary sources can provide solid support for your argument. While secondary sources highlight the connection between your work and previous research, primary sources are more dependable as evidence. If you wish to confirm your experiment's conclusion, secondary sources can prove to be more beneficial. Primary sources are the foundation of original research; they provide unique information, establish a sound rationale for your claims, and present reliable facts about your topic. Secondary sources offer an all-inclusive perspective of your subject and insights into other researchers' methods. They frequently consolidate multiple primary materials that would require significant time and effort to obtain independently. For additional information on primary sources, please refer to the following link: brainly.com/question/19649709 #SPJ9